June 23, 2015
Quasi-experimental evidence on the relation between child care subsidies and child care quality
In this article we present quasi-experimental evidence on the relation between child care subsidies and child care quality. We exploit the difference in funding of private and public centers in the Netherlands.

A recent subsidy cut reduced funding for private centers while funding for public centers was unaffected. The quality measurements are from a panel survey in which centers' quality was evaluated through classroom assessments by trained observers. Using differences-in-differences we find that the subsidy reduction caused a statistically significant decrease in quality of one fifth of a standard deviation. We also present results for nonlinear differences-in-differences estimators. The decline in quality is robust across specifications and appears to be driven by a decline in the middle of the distribution. A limitation of our data set is that our pre-reform period is short, so that we can not perform pre-reform placebo tests.
Authors
Emre Akgunduz

Paul P.M. Leseman
Janneke Plantenga
Related
Maatschappelijke kosten-batenanalyse kan brede welvaartsperspectief beter meenemenCPB start nieuw programma Brede WelvaartGrote verschillen tussen scholen in percentage leerlingen dat meerdere diploma’s haaltInzet wijkteams vermindert gebruik van zwaardere ouderenzorg nietInvesteren in de arbeidsmarktintegratie van statushouders, achtergronddocument