May 11, 2010

School responsiveness to quality ranking: An empirical analysis of secondary education in the Netherlands

Kwaliteitsinformatie maakt verschil in voortgezet onderwijs

Press release

We are sorry, unfortunately there is no English translation of this page.

Spokesmen

Foto Karen van der Wiel
Karen van der Wiel +31 6 42216646 Read more
Pierre Koning Read more

We contribute to the literature in two respects. First, the current analysis is the first to address the impact of quality scores that have been published by a newspaper (Trouw), rather than public interventions that aim to track and improve failing schools. Second, our research design exploits the substantial lags in the registration and publication of the Trouw scores and takes into account all possible outcomes of the ratings, instead of the lowest category only.

Overall, we find evidence that school quality performance does respond to the Trouw quality scores. Both average grades increase and the number of diplomas go up after receiving a negative score. These responses cannot be attributed to gaming activities of the school board, as an improvement is also observed in the gaming-proof quality indicators. For schools that receive the most negative ranking, the short-term effects (one year after a change in the ranking of schools) of quality transparency on final exam grades equal 10% to 30% of a standard deviation compared to the average of this variable. The long-run effects are roughly equal to the short-term effects.

Contacts

Pierre Koning Read more
Foto Karen van der Wiel
Karen van der Wiel +31 6 42216646 Read more

Read more about