December 7, 2017
Cost-Sharing Design Matters: A Comparison of the Rebate and Deductible in Healthcare
Since 2006, the Dutch population has faced two different cost-sharing schemes in health insurance for curative care: a mandatory rebate of 255 euros in 2006 and 2007, and since 2008 a mandatory deductible. Using administrative data for the entire Dutch population, we compare the effect of both cost-sharing schemes on healthcare consumption between 2006 and 2013.
We use a regression discontinuity design which exploits the fact that persons younger than eighteen years old neither face a rebate nor a deductible. Our fixed effect estimate shows that for individuals around the age of eighteen, a one euro increase of the deductible reduces healthcare expenditures 18 eurocents more than a euro increase of the rebate. These results demonstrate that differences in the design of a cost-sharing scheme can lead to substantial different effects on total healthcare expenditure.
This is a revised version of the paper (Januray 2019). Compared to the previous version of December 2017, this version includes additional analyses, assumption tests and a difference-in-differences framework.
Downloads
Contacts


Related
Inzet wijkteams vermindert gebruik van zwaardere ouderenzorg nietMoeilijk bereikbare jongeren krijgen meer jeugdhulp als wijkteams zelf behandelenHogere eigen bijdrage verpleeghuis leidt tot uitstel van verpleeghuisopnameGebruik type jeugdzorg hangt samen met gemeentelijk inkoopbeleidEigen betalingen in de Zorgverzekeringswet: bijlage bij het rapport 'Zorgkeuzes in Kaart 2020'